/ solutions

Built for the person
who actually writes the tests.

Most QA tools were built for the manager who buys them. Yalitest was built for the QA, dev, and EM who lives inside the work.

/ qa engineers

Get back the
11pm hours.

You don't need help running tests — you've got that. You need help thinking up the ones nobody asked for. Yalitest is the senior tester sitting next to you, refusing to let an edge case ship.

—“Coverage is fine” — until the 8am Slack thread says it isn’t.
—Specs land Tuesday. Release is Friday. You have Wednesday.
—Manual regression suites that nobody updated since 2023.
—Stakeholder asks “did we test X?” — you’d like a real answer.

Try a release plan →

persona output · checkout-v2.4

Eight perspectives, every run.

Edge case, accessibility, performance, elderly, power, new — they each draft their own tests. The merger collapses overlap and tags every card with the persona that wrote it.

regular_user14 tests

edge_case21 tests

a11y9 tests

config_admin7 tests

performance6 tests

after merge62 unique tests

~12s

to first card

parallel agents

P0/1/2

priority tags

/ developers

Ship without
“works on my machine.”

You wrote the feature in a day. Now write the test plan in two minutes — paste your PR description, attach screenshots, get a full coverage map you can hand back to QA, or run yourself.

—The PRD is in Notion. The Figma is somewhere. The PR is on GitHub.
—You'd write more tests if you could think of more tests.
—Your manual smoke pass before merge is, honestly, three clicks.
—CI catches what the code knew to look for. Nothing else.

Generate from a PR →

terminal · yalitest cli

Drops into your existing toolchain.

CLI, REST, GitHub Action. Pipe in a PR diff and a Figma URL — get back a JSON test plan you can pin to a comment, ship to Linear, or hand to QA.

$ yalitest gen --pr 4821 --figma checkout
→ parsing diff (12 files) … done
→ ui_analyzer · 4 screens
→ dispatching 8 personas …
✓ 47 tests written to ./suite.json
✓ posted as PR comment

CLI

node binary

JSON

structured out

github action

/ engineering managers

Coverage you can
actually defend.

When your VP asks “what was tested for this release?” — point at the workspace. Every test traces to a spec section. Every gap is a BLOCKED card waiting for a product answer. No more vibes.

—Testing budget is scrutinised. Outcomes aren't measurable.
—You can't tell which specs are unambiguous and which aren't.
—Test debt grows; people leave; nobody knows what's covered.
—Procurement says “no per-seat” but every QA tool charges per seat.

See team pricing →

release-readiness · checkout-v2.4

Every test traces to a spec line.

Hover any card to see exactly which paragraph in which document spawned it. Unanswered ambiguities become BLOCKED tests — tracked, not buried.

covered (P0/P1)39 / 39 ✓

covered (P2)23 / 25 ✓

BLOCKED · awaiting product3 questions

spec ambiguity scorelow

100%

P0 traced

$500

flat / mo

5 seats

included

/ where teams use it

Six places it earns its keep.

01 · pre-sprint

Spec triage

Drop the PRD in. The clarifying-questions pass exposes ambiguity before kickoff — not during QA week.

~2 min · before refinement

02 · per-pr

PR coverage check

CLI runs against the diff and figma. Comments back the test plan. Reviewer sees what's covered, what isn't.

~30s · in CI

03 · release

Release readiness

Build a full P0/P1/P2 plan from the release scope doc. Trace every requirement. Sign-off becomes auditable.

~5 min · pre-RC

04 · regression

Regression refresh

Paste in last quarter's regression suite — get a re-prioritised version against today's product surface.

quarterly

05 · audit

Compliance evidence

Export to TestRail with provenance metadata. Auditors see test ↔ requirement mapping at a glance.

SOC 2 · ISO 27001

06 · solo

One-person QA team

If you're the only tester at a 30-person company: this is the second tester you needed. We made it for you.

read the post →

Bring a spec.
Leave with a plan.

Free tier. No credit card. Five real runs to decide.

Open chat →Pricing

Get back the
11pm hours.

You don't need help running tests — you've got that. You need help thinking up the ones nobody asked for. Yalitest is the senior tester sitting next to you, refusing to let an edge case ship.

—“Coverage is fine” — until the 8am Slack thread says it isn’t.

—Specs land Tuesday. Release is Friday. You have Wednesday.

—Manual regression suites that nobody updated since 2023.

—Stakeholder asks “did we test X?” — you’d like a real answer.

Try a release plan →

Ship without
“works on my machine.”

You wrote the feature in a day. Now write the test plan in two minutes — paste your PR description, attach screenshots, get a full coverage map you can hand back to QA, or run yourself.

—The PRD is in Notion. The Figma is somewhere. The PR is on GitHub.

—You'd write more tests if you could think of more tests.

—Your manual smoke pass before merge is, honestly, three clicks.

—CI catches what the code knew to look for. Nothing else.

Generate from a PR →

$ yalitest gen --pr 4821 --figma checkout → parsing diff (12 files) … done → ui_analyzer · 4 screens → dispatching 8 personas … ✓ 47 tests written to ./suite.json ✓ posted as PR comment

Coverage you can
actually defend.

When your VP asks “what was tested for this release?” — point at the workspace. Every test traces to a spec section. Every gap is a BLOCKED card waiting for a product answer. No more vibes.

—Testing budget is scrutinised. Outcomes aren't measurable.

—You can't tell which specs are unambiguous and which aren't.

—Test debt grows; people leave; nobody knows what's covered.

—Procurement says “no per-seat” but every QA tool charges per seat.

See team pricing →

Six places it earns its keep.

01 · pre-sprint

Spec triage

Drop the PRD in. The clarifying-questions pass exposes ambiguity before kickoff — not during QA week.

~2 min · before refinement

02 · per-pr

PR coverage check

CLI runs against the diff and figma. Comments back the test plan. Reviewer sees what's covered, what isn't.

~30s · in CI

03 · release

Release readiness

Build a full P0/P1/P2 plan from the release scope doc. Trace every requirement. Sign-off becomes auditable.

~5 min · pre-RC

04 · regression

Regression refresh

Paste in last quarter's regression suite — get a re-prioritised version against today's product surface.

quarterly

05 · audit

Compliance evidence

Export to TestRail with provenance metadata. Auditors see test ↔ requirement mapping at a glance.

SOC 2 · ISO 27001

06 · solo

One-person QA team

If you're the only tester at a 30-person company: this is the second tester you needed. We made it for you.

read the post →

Built for the personwho actually writes the tests.

Get back the11pm hours.

Eight perspectives, every run.

Ship without“works on my machine.”

Drops into your existing toolchain.

Coverage you canactually defend.

Every test traces to a spec line.

Six places it earns its keep.

Spec triage

PR coverage check

Release readiness

Regression refresh

Compliance evidence

One-person QA team

Bring a spec.Leave with a plan.

Built for the personwho actually writes the tests.

Get back the11pm hours.

Eight perspectives, every run.

Ship without“works on my machine.”

Drops into your existing toolchain.

Coverage you canactually defend.

Every test traces to a spec line.

Six places it earns its keep.

Spec triage

PR coverage check

Release readiness

Regression refresh

Compliance evidence

One-person QA team

Bring a spec.Leave with a plan.

Built for the person
who actually writes the tests.

Get back the
11pm hours.

Ship without
“works on my machine.”

Coverage you can
actually defend.

Bring a spec.
Leave with a plan.

Built for the person
who actually writes the tests.

Get back the
11pm hours.

Ship without
“works on my machine.”

Coverage you can
actually defend.

Bring a spec.
Leave with a plan.