Loading...
Loading...
Most platforms automate the running of tests. Yalitest automates the writing of them. Different problem. Different price. Different team buys it.
Built around the idea that the bottleneck is execution. Record a flow once, replay it on every PR, watch it flake when the DOM changes.
The bottleneck is thinking up the tests, not running them. Eight personas read your spec and screens, debate coverage, and hand you an execution-ready plan in seconds.
we're not replacing your runner. we're filling the empty doc that comes before it.
We're comparing categories, not individual products — pick the row that matches your bottleneck.
→ generalised. categories, not products. specifics depend on the vendor.
Most teams keep their automation platform for execution and add Yalitest upstream — to author what gets run. Five steps to a happier release.
Drop the PRD, screens, walkthrough into the chat workspace. Eight personas draft coverage in parallel.
Filter to P0/P1, dismiss the cards that don't apply, ask for negative variants on the ones that do.
Approved tests sync to your existing system of record, with persona tags and spec-line provenance.
Engineers automate the cards worth automating. Manual testers cover the rest. Yalitest doesn't fight either.
Yalitest reads only what changed in the spec; you only review the new and changed cards.
If your release plan looks better than what you'd have written, we've earned the trial.